Obviously the cop in Ferguson Missouri isn’t going to be charged.

Don’t be stupid. This is such an easy case with an obvious verdict.

Ignorance of fact is not an excuse when you’re either out on the streets destroying property and stealing or if you’re inciting those to do so from the comfort of your home. Victim mentality destroys lives. Be the cure, not the cause.

It’s sad and pathetic that there is a building threat of violence and destruction over a completely manufactured outrage but sadly, we’ve seen this before. A similar public outcry fueled by hippie lies and bigotry caused a similar firestorm 2 years ago with Trayvon Martin. Here’s how these both were constructed and how, even though the jury has not released a statement on the Ferguson Missouri case at the time of this writing, I know it will go exactly the way the previous manufactured outrage-of-ignorance story of racism and death occurred.

 

START WITH A BASELESS RACIST PREMISE…

The story of Ferguson claims that officer Darren Wilson pulled Michael Brown over for walking in the middle of the street – not because you’re not supposed to do that, but just because Michael Brown was brown. The evidence for this was that… Michael Brown was brown. That’s the sole detail for the claim of racism. White cop pulls over black guy being shady and it is because of racism. Not because of any history from officer Wilson, statements or context – just because Wilson is white and Brown is brown.

This is the same thing we were told 2 years ago in the Trayvon Martin case against George Zimmerman. The claim was that Zimmerman saw a black man who didn’t live in his neighborhood wandering around other peoples houses in the rain and called 911 because the guy looked like he was on drugs (what Zimmerman told the 911 dispatcher). Martin then ran away from Zimmerman causing Zimmerman to follow wherever he was running away from.

The facts of both cases are that both Martin and Brown had histories of fighting and stealing and had marijuana in their system at this time. Martin was walking back to his dads girlfriends house after purchasing 2 of the ingredients of a drug cocktail called Lean that his Facebook revealed him to be a fan of and Brown had just bullied a store owner while stealing a box of Swisher Sweets (cheap cigars my dumb friends in Missouri while I was in high school there would buy to either act cool while smoking or repack with weed as is commonly done).

So what is more likely? That Both George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson chose those fateful days to commit the first acts of racism on record in their lives and suspect a man of shady activity simply because of their skin shade? Or that both Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown were creepy acting dudes worthy of suspicion and Officer Wilson did his duty by pulling Brown over and Neighborhood Watchman Zimmerman did his duty by calling 911 and keeping an eye on Martin?

 

CONTINUE WITH ABURD CLAIMS OF HARSH PURSUIT & MURDER

The story of Ferguson then claims that Darren Wilson, for reasons unknown, grabbed Michael Brown (standing 6’5, 289lbs) and used his secret Hulk-like strength, pulled him into his police vehicle but Brown escaped and fled the officer, resulting in a shot to the back, in turn causing Brown to cease fleeing, turn around with his hands in the air and get gunned down by Wilson anyway. Because Reasons. [hint: racism].

Similarly, we were told that Trayvon Martin was just walking back to the place he was staying when George Zimmerman was eyeing him for no reason, causing the frightened Martin to run away, in turn causing Zimmerman to exit his car to continue eyeing Martins location. Zimmerman, tracking the target he had called 911 on told the dispatcher on the phone what he was doing and the dispatcher replied “we don’t need you to do that”. We were told this made Zimmermans act of walking the streets of the neighborhood in which he lived a legal and/or moral crime because if someone doesn’t need you to watch where a suspicious person is going, then by decree of laws, legal & moral, that don’t exist, you must not follow said person. We were then told that Zimmerman saw Martin and most likely physically assaulted him for no reason, causing Zimmerman to get his ass beat into the pavement by Martin as Martin screamed for help in between blows to Zimmermans face, and Zimmerman fought dirty by using his legally owned firearm at his side to fire a single deadly shot into Martins chest minutes before the 911 police arrived.

Officer Wilson claimed that Michael Brown resisted the police approach and attempted to grab his gun, causing him to fire a shot, then ran and the “hands in the air surrender” is complete myth. George Zimmerman claimed that Trayvon Martin walked up to him after Zimmerman was walking back to his car and punched Zimmerman in the face, causing a scuffle that resulted in Martin laying on top of Zimmerman smashing his head into the pavement as Zimmerman screamed for help and when Martin saw the gun at Zimmermans side and tried to grab it, Zimerman himself used the firearm to fire a single defense shot into Martins chest.

The facts of both cases are that the autopsies of both Brown and Martin found, in addition to the pre-mentioned marijuana use, that the gunshots were fired in close range, evidencing an altercation, debunking the “executioner” meme that was being peddled. Brown had a close range shot fired to his hand, seemingly stemming from an altercation around the police car, with the position of a right-thumb wound and “gunpowder particulate material in the wound” congruent with Brown having been reaching for the officers gun.

Originally the story was that Zimmerman straight up chased after Martin and shot him, and was kissed goodnight by white racist cops that night before being set free but once the evidence of Zimmermans bleeding head and busted nose surfaced, this was changed to Zimmerman merely instigating the fight and then losing it on purpose as an excuse to kill a random black person that night. Martins body was shown to be unscathed, save for the singular gunshot wound that caused his demise.  An eye witness testified seeing Martin on top of Zimmerman smashing his face “ground and pound” MMA style and someone screaming in the background can be heard during the recording of the 911 call made by a neighbor reporting the fight between Zimmerman and Martin which Zimmerman says is him and Trayvons mother said was her son.

So what is more likely? That both George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson chose those fateful days to commit their first murders (that we know of) and the close range injuries were incurred during Martin and Brown defending themselves against senseless brutality and the unbiased eye witnesses in both cases were just lying? Or that both Brown and Martin were continuing their histories of senseless violence on the days of their deaths and happened to pick fights with the wrong legal gun wielders who legally used said guns in acts of response to said violence?

 

MAKE THE PERSON WHO DIED SOUND WEAK AND NON-THREATENING

The phrase “unarmed black man” practically replaced the names in media reports of both men in order to push a victim meme. Trayvon Martin was taller than George Zimmerman of course and Michael Brown, at 6 foot 5 inches 289 pounds, was taller than everyone. Pictures of Trayvon Martin from years earlier as a child were circulated in media reports and protests instead of the intimidating figure he actually was on the night of his death and Michael Brown was repeatedly referred to as a “gentle giant”. Here is Brown on the day of his death assaulting the store clerk he was stealing his cigars from…

Both men had histories of fighting, drug use, and embrace of anti-authoritarian violence culture while the men who killed them….didn’t. At all. The response to this was of course the strawman fallacy that just because someone enjoys a little weed and other drugs, media violence and has some real life violence in their history doesn’t mean they deserve to be shot dead, but of course literally no one anywhere makes such a claim so the point is a non-point.

In both cases protestors adopted the personas of both men saying “I AM [persons name]”. This particularly distasteful form of protest glorifies and perpetuates exactly the causes of both mens death.

 

THE LEGAL VERDICT WILL BE THE SAME…

At the time of this writing, the verdict of the grand jury in the Michael Brown case has not been announced but it is painfully obvious that no charges will or should be issued as there is just no evidence to support the meme’s that would demand such indictment. The tragic irony is that the race baiters pushing this victim mentality are creating more victims and causing more deaths. Calling for the blood of a man who by all evidence (including a half dozen black witnesses that corroborated Darren Wilsons claims) merely reacted to violence appropriately resulting in an unfortunate death brought on by the violent perpetrator, is not helpful.

Darren Wilson will not be indicted just like George Zimmerman wasn’t.

What is more likely? That this is because Juries are so racist that they can’t possibly bring themselves to analyze facts properly? Or that the proper analyzation of the facts simply doesn’t support any victimization in either of these two cases?

There is no shortage of real injustices going on in this country and this world. It is asinine for these hippie race baiters to manufacture outrage over instances like these.

Leave a Reply