Tag: transgender

J.K. Rowling reiterates that “women like me can’t be bullied out of resistance”

“Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling refused to stop being a feminist in favor of woke demands in places where being a trans-advocate conflicts with feminism and many have pointed out that she damaged her legacy by it. Most pointing this out, however, don’t do so in order to note her courage as a strong independent woman, but to criticize and mock her for not bending the knee to the latest terms that increasingly powerful elements of Cultural Marxism demands. Rowling remains politically Leftist/Progressive, pro-trans and a trans-advocate, but has consistently stood up for the reality that women exist, which causes the increasingly dominant wing of wokeism to smear her as anti-trans.

Other feminist icons such as “Handmaid’s Tale” author Margaret Atwood have pointed out the same things as Rowling, such as the insanity of making the use of the word “woman” a controversial taboo that is somehow insensitive to the gender dysphoric, but the woke condemnation of these female-identifying-persons doesn’t meet that of Rowlings because Rowlings work was so much more influential and celebrated among the generation that has also been indoctrinated into believing things like “the use of the word ‘woman’ is offensive”.

The efforts to smear the creator of the HarryPotterverse over her position that some experiences are in fact inherent to biological female life have been wholly ineffective in getting her to shut up on the subject so lately many of her haters have tried using an appeal to her legacy to help argue the point. The thinking is that if they can’t bully her into submission, then perhaps they can extort her into bending the knee under threat of being tarnished in history as a horrible person for her mainstream views.

Rowling, at this time, has expressed no interest to negotiate with terrorists.

Post Transgender Revolution: What else can people re-assign about themselves?

Transgenderism isn’t new but the backlash against anyone who doesn’t fully applaud it as a totally normal celebratory stage of human evolution is.

This is odd because as society shifts towards the newly accepted norm that a person is whatever gender they identify as (and you’re a hateful bigot if you say anything otherwise), science remains the same. So if surface surgical procedures that don’t change your biological reality is now an acceptable identity…What other scientific realities can people change?

It’s not a “slippery slope” argument – it’s a real question?

If i’ve always felt I was black. Can I undergo racial reassignment surgery? Under this new Transphobic doctrine I can, but would I receive the same support as a transracial person as I would if I were a transgender person? Why applaud a man turning their hotdog into a donut in order to live a life as a woman but condemn a person getting a permanent tan and hair crimping in order to identify as an African American?

I’ve always felt I was 17. Can I undergo age reassignment surgery to young-up my face and then be accepted by society as a 17 year old? Then, just how it’s bigoted and obscenely hateful to note that a man who undergoes surgery to look like a woman, it will likewise be such for anyone who doesn’t accept my I’m actually twice that age

It’s time to Edward Cullen this bitch up.

UPDATE: This post was written just 1 week before the story of Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who was exposed for posing to be black and stuck by her identification as a personal identity, broke in June 2015. I’m not psychic – I was just going off the logical extension of the premise of societies view of gender reassignments.