Rice for Vice?

I thought Condoleezza Rice would have and should have been the VP nominee last election when I thought the two tickets were going to be Clinton/Obama vs Romney/Rice. This column says she should be the GOP nominee’s (Romney, this time. unless Republicans are stupid enough to fuck it up a 2nd time) VP pick but chooses to pun-up the article to crazy degrees. First of all, the title is One president, please, with a side of Rice. Ug… but tolerable. But then read this introduction:

Republican diners haven’t yet picked their entree, but they’ve narrowed it down to the steak or the fish. Still, just as interesting as their main course will be their side selection: Will they go for a drab salad, or something more exciting? Maybe a spicy Rice dish?

Yes, that Rice: Condi. She’s rested and ready – and buff.

……

The rest of the article argues it’s case fine and all, its just… how do you take it seriously after that groan-worthy opening paragraph? oy…

America’s first black female secretary of state is quietly positioning herself to be the top choice of the eventual Republican presidential nominee, ready to deliver bona fide foreign-policy credentials lacking among the candidates. The 56-year-old has recently raised her profile, releasing her memoir in November and embarking on a monthlong book tour.

After 2 1/2 years as a professor at Stanford, Miss Rice is reportedly getting “antsy” to get back into the political game. “She’s ready to go,” said one top source.

T-Mobile and AT&T Merger Called off

T-Mobile will not be bought by AT&T. Sub-headline: Opposition from the Obama administration over competition and job losses proves too big to overcome. The companies say more capacity to handle growing mobile usage is needed. Sprint is a winner; shares jump.

I guess we will never see this product realized:

AT&T and T-Mobile called off their $39-billion merger late today, a move that could cost AT&T $4 billion before taxes in cancellation costs, trim revenues for investment banks by $150 million and give Sprint Nextel another shot at becoming a true player in the mobile market.

The AT&T’s purchase of T-Mobile from Germany’s Deutsche Telekom would have made it the nation’s largest cellphone company. AT&T is now the country’s second-largest wireless carrier; T-Mobile is the fourth-largest. But it’s not going to happen because critics said the deal was anti-competitive.

Sprint shares jumped 6%, or 13 cents, to $2.29 because investors bet the company would be better able to compete against AT&T and Verizon Wireless, the joint venture of Verizon Communications and British telecom giant Vodaphone.

Ding Dong Kim Jong is Dead

When I heard that Lil Kim died, I was devastated but when they clarified that it was jus the pot bellied 2 foot tall evil dictator of North Korea Kim Jong-Il, I was like “aww. daz okay den”. Fo Reel.

The death reports say he died from being “overworked”. Uh ya. just like “everyone in North Korea has enough to eat”.

He should have taken a note from Diabetes (some comedian has in his standup: “why don’t they call it LIVE-abetes?”):

Via EW: Kim Jong-il was a secretive man but his good friend General Aladeen (the character played by Sacha Baron Cohen in the new movie The Dictator) gave us all a rare glimpse into the North Korean dictator’s private life today with a personal statement on the passing of his beloved badminton partner, released today via Huffington Post.

“I am saddened to learn of the passing of my dear friend Kim Jong-Il. Our thoughts go out to his wife and 813 children. “K-Jo” was a great leader, good friend and average double’s badminton partner. He died as he lived, in 3-inch lifts. An extraordinary man, he did so much to spread compassion, wisdom and uranium throughout the world.”

Aladeen concluded by welcoming Kim’s successor, Kim Jong-un, into the “Axis of Evil.” But I thought you had to pledge first?

UPDATE: Here’s the Trailer for The Dictator:

even better?:

Perry collecting Pension while still employed as Governor

Speakin uh Texus – ayve got a great set a ideas: how bout #1 – y’all run a religiousy Governor from that state who aint well spoken 4yrs after Dubya. 2: have him be the guy who will fix Obama’s crazy-irresponsible entitlement program mess while he himself collects his pension despite still being a sitting governor, and 3:… well, I forget what 3 is… oops.

The better summary that I just got in an instant message about this story: Texas Gov. Rick Perry is collecting a salary and retirement benefits simultaneously … A report filed with the Federal Election Commission shows that Perry is collecting his $7,700 monthly state pension in addition to his nearly $133,000 annual salary as governor.

A friend cautioned me with the following: “Don’t hate the player, hate the game. Its not his fault… The system is obviously flawed and that’s what people should be upset with. Not Perry who is just using what he is allowed… I mean, it is fucked up, but he isn’t being corrupt about it.”

And he’s right of course. Perry isn’t doing anything illegal or even out of the ordinary. I should make it more clear that I’m just further spotlighting how he’s not a good candidate, not that he’s corrupt or even a hypocrite in this regard. it’s just so clearly NOT this dudes time that his candidacy urks me.

I probably wouldn’t like Perry as a candidate for anything beyond Texan elected office (he’s done fine as Governor, but that doesn’t justify a national promotion) but my point isn’t that Perry is a terrible and dishonorable person or even unfit for for any office. Just that he’s an unfit candidate at this time. My point is similar to the one made by Andrew C. McCarthy in National Review about GOP candidate Jon Huntsman (former Governor of Utah and former Ambassador to China under the Obama Administration). McCarthy notes that there may not be anything wrong with Huntsman to make him blocked out for consideration for president (I personally, like him) but for this election cycle, it just aint a good fit. Emphasis added by me below:

Here is the totality of their argument: “Governor Huntsman has a solid record, notwithstanding his sometimes glib foreign-policy pronouncements; his main weakness is his apparent inability, so far, to forge a connection with conservative voters outside Utah.”

Seriously? When you ask conservatives and Republicans what they think of Governor Huntsman’s bid, you don’t get a bunch of psycho-babble about “inability to forge a connection.” You get, “Why would Republicans nominate a guy Obama picked for an important role in his administration?” Huntsman was the president’s ambassador to China — a fact the Editors, remarkably, omit. So, when it comes to Bachmann, the Editors think “anti-vaccine rumors” are a disqualifier; on Huntsman, however, somehow the little matter of his service in the Obama administration doesn’t even rate a mention. To be clear, I am not suggesting that there is anything dishonorable about Huntsman’s service. But we’re not talking about whether he should be ostracized; we’re talking about whether he is a viable candidate in a race Republicans must frame as a referendum on the Obama administration. How bad can the administration be if we’re going to recruit our nominee from it?

Again: I don’t even agree with the substance of the above point (I don’t see a problem at all with the fact that Hunstman served his president when he was asked, even though it was from the opposition party. I respect it), I’m only noting the parallel in the argument, which is why each man is not good for this election cycle, not why either is unfit for office or a terrible person.

BONUS:

UPDATE: Ad hits Gingrich and Perry on ethics. Reminder: Mitt Romney is squeaky clean in that area.

Accidental Slut (Song by Riki Lindhome)

I know at least a dozen female friends who would find this song hilarious but I know zero female friends who would accept me sharing this song with them without insisting that I am trying to send a message specifically to them, so after I share it with the ones that know this is true about their slutty selves, I can just post it here and hope the rest eventually stumble upon it. Well, that’s only kindasorta true…I know a FEW chicks whom I could share this with that arent total hobags without going all girl on me (eg: “wtf is THIS supposed to mean? you think this is funny cuz it pertains to me? is that it? is that what you think of me? i think we should discuss this for an hour and a half right now…”)

The song is by half of the comedy music duo Garfunkle an Oats, Riki Lindhome (also known as the bitchy sister from Million Dollar Baby):

Accidental Slut [Explicit]
(random songs from random artists will play after this one, so just ex it out when its done)

here she is with her Oats partner, not featured in the above song:

& a live performance from Lindhome:

Most ladies choose to zap their pubic hair these days

Ashley Fetters in the Atlantic laments and explores America’s greatest endangered species: Pubic Hair. She points the finger at Carrie Bradshaw (huh? Sex in the City had lots of pubic grooming talk in it?) and Barbie (lol) but even bigger than those two culprits? Blame teh Pornz:

Although sex, hygiene, and clothing are all contributing factors, Fitzpatrick, Herbenick, and Pinto all agree that there’s one main driving force behind America’s villainization of pubic hair: pornography.

When a team of researchers from George Washington University took a closer look at Playboy‘s representations of women’s genitalia throughout the years, they found that in issues dating from the magazine’s inception in 1953 up through the 1970s and ’80s, more than 95 percent of the centerfolds and naked models sported full, apparently natural pubic hair.

In the late 20th century, though, that changed. As Joseph Slade, professor of media and culture at Ohio University, puts it, the media legitimized voyeurism and turned it into a way of life; suddenly, porn viewers wanted to see everything more deeply and without the veil of hair. Thus, Playboy‘s love affair with the au naturel look faded: By the 1990s, more than a third of the models appeared to have removed some of their pubic hair. And in the new millennium, less than 10 percent of nude models now sport the full pubic bush, while a third remove their hair partially and one-quarter remove it completely. Playboy has trimmed down the standard from the un-modified, detail-obscuring “fur bikini” it helped popularize in the 1960s to the vanishing act it promotes today.

Hugh Hefner’s magazine, however, isn’t the only supporter of the tress-less treasure chest. Rather, says Slade, genital alopecia seems to have hit the entire adult entertainment industry. “Depilation took hold in visual porn in the 1990s, though some actresses trimmed for movies before then,” Slade says. “It was easier to keep crotches cleaner on the set. But certainly the practice is widespread in video porn today. Enough so that backlash has created a niche fetish for ‘full bushes.'”

But while the sleek, slick, bare labia majora is more common in visual porn today than ever before, the stylized hairless vulva has actually been around for centuries. According to Slade, as far back as the 15th century, women — especially prostitutes — often shaved their pubic hair to avoid lice infestation, which is where having a muff may have picked up its stigma of being “unclean.” In the years following, medieval and classical European sculptors and painters omitted pubic hair from depictions of female nudes; In fact, the notion of pubic hair in general was so unholy that every last naked prophet on the Sistine Chapel ceiling is completely hairless below the neck. But life didn’t dare imitate art — at least, that is, not until Playboy.

Read the whole article for a study that reports that women under 30 are up to 3 times more likely to have no public hair than women over 30, and my favorite part: this story of one womans recollection of how her high school boyfriend got excited when she finally got rid of the bush once a month:

Though Pinto says sex has never felt any different to her without pubic hair (“Once we get going, who cares?” she says with a laugh), there certainly remains a sexual motive for taking it all off: Drawing back the curtain of pubic hair exposes the clitoris, the labia and the vagina for plain viewing. There’s a tactile element, too: As one elated young husband named Mark explained to Glamour in 2009, “The skin down there is protected — it never really touches anything, it never sees the sun — so it’s ridiculously soft.

“You can’t really tell how soft it is until a woman waxes. Oh my God, you can’t believe how soft it is when you wax,” 28-year-old Mark gushed. “It’s extremely, extremely soft, so it feels great when you have sex.”

Pinto’s past boyfriends, she says, would wholeheartedly agree. “Once, I started dating someone when I hadn’t waxed in a while,” she says, “And then when I did, he went, Oh! This is awesome! Why didn’t you do this before?!”

“That was my senior year of high school,” she adds. “So every month I would text him, ‘Guess who’s getting a wax!’ And he’d be like, ‘Smiley face, so excited!'”

Harry Potter VS The Bible

Did you know that Harry Potter was “directly copied” from the Bible?… So says this person. My ignorance of the Potter series, the fact that even literature openly intended to be allegories of the new testament (Narnia) aren’t usually called “direct copies” of their biblical source material among other things added to my reaction of this being kindov…weird. but I’ll share it here for you to decide.

Does it bother me that Harry Potter directly copied its story from the Bible? A little bit. What bothers me more is the amount of people out there worshipping Harry Potter instead of the real Person who resurrected from the dead Jesus Christ.

It’s not just the phony ‘resurrection’ I’m talking about either. J.K. Rowling made the clear parallels between the devil and Voldemort from the very beginning. And of course made Harry Potter to go through the same rejected, slain, raised pattern as Jesus Christ. Everybody at school thought he was a liar, no one would help him (except for his dedicated followers… errr… friends).

I took a while to catch on; I think the fact that she used ‘constant vigilance’ which is what our same warning is in Scripture about Satan tipped me off in some way (and really bothered me at the time). Then of course Voldemort started to have eyes and ears everywhere – quite like going around like a ‘roaring lion’. The snake was a major tip off and then also the fact that some of his followers had names assigned with constellations that had something to do with Satan.

And then of course there was the clincher. “The last enemy to be conquered is death.” From 1 Corinthians 15:26 and passed off as Rowling’s own. Speaking of course of the resurrection, the resurrection of the bodies of all believers. How in the viewpoint of the Harry Potter series ‘death’ can be an enemy I’m not so sure. But in the real world Satan brought death and from him it has become an enemy. In any other worldview besides Christianity it makes no sense to view death as an enemy because it’s supposed to be ‘natural’. So of course Harry Potter was inconsistent, as many people in the world today are.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a Harry hater (I have read all the books) but does Jesus get the glory from all this? No. Is it evil that someone would profit so profusely from stealing a story right out of Scripture? Yes it is.

Just remember that Jesus is the only one who can give life, NOT Harry Potter. Think about it.